Jump to content

Talk:Rohingya people

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Semi-protected edit request on 1 May 2023

[edit]

They are not aryan they are Sanskrit stop lieing to those people were they not apart of a sultanate at one time with khan relations the others were called asiatic then Indonesian Giving impression that they are bad I think there's use to be what they called a Ba'al towards Bulgaria then bao wolf towards Germany Belgium then bao means something different in Asian chineses language but towards Lebanon it become Allah Sudan Baha'i also means something different Babai which goes to wards Romania then to wards the other way they Romani gypsie so I guess it would be blessing be to be in a house of a lord meaning those that would accept them so who was will to acceptthem those are all different so called lords Europe 154.20.52.238 (talk) 00:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incoherent rant. Not entertaining. Yue🌙 02:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

There are many hyperlinks and URLs in the references section that do not have an archival link. Other editors, please make sure to add archive links from either Wayback Machine or Ghostarchive to all hyperlinks and URLs. It would extremely help in historical preservation and research. Battlesnake1 (talk) 17:00, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rohingya population in the USA

[edit]

All sources say 12,000 people, with some populations given for individual cities etc. Milwaukee and Chicago seen to have the leading populations.

https://rli.blogs.sas.ac.uk/2022/03/10/rohingya-in-america-the-challenge-of-language-and-culture/

https://www.zakat.org/how-two-midwest-cities-are-handling-rohingya-resettlement 2603:6011:A600:46:A11C:4484:88AA:5B11 (talk) 19:34, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Action Required: Rohingya are not Arakanese Indian

[edit]

The term "Arakanese Indian" has never been used to refer to the Rohingya people, and the provided references do not substantiate such a claim. This appears to be a fabricated narrative, propagated by the Arakan Army and certain Rakhine groups, aiming to misrepresent the Rohingya identity. The term falsely implies that Rohingya originate from India, which is misleading and historically inaccurate.

Historically, similar tactics were used to label the Rohingya as "Bengali," implying foreign origins, which ultimately contributed to the justification of genocide against them. Now that the term "Bengali" has been widely recognized as a discriminatory and baseless misrepresentation, there seems to be an effort to introduce another misleading label. Maung Sawyeddollah (talk) 06:36, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source required EvergreenFir (talk) 06:44, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A news article that says about being used Bangali to refer Rohingya as a hateful term: https://thediplomat.com/2019/12/myanmars-rohingya-vs-bengali-hate-speech-debate/
And
This article shares the details about the "Arakenese Indian" depressing indictment of Myanmar society. FYI: The term "Kalar" is the Burmese version of "Indian." Further details are explained in the article. https://myanmarmix.com/en/articles/how-the-word-kalar-is-a-depressing-indictment-of-myanmar-society Maung Sawyeddollah (talk) 07:03, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]