Jump to content

Talk:Bank of England

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reaction in the City

[edit]

It was very popular with the City of London, showing a sign of the new government's desire for a strong economy. Following the announcement the FTSE 100 Index leapt rapidly. The pound reached its highest level against the Deutsche mark since Sterling's exit from the ERM.

These remarks don't hold up when viewing the data. The FTSE didn't move a significant amount given the volatility of the period. The move in May (2.7%) was smaller than the previous April (4.4%) or the subsequent move in June (3.7%) (Bloomberg). These moves are about 1 standard deviation, i.e. not unusual. Similarly for the pound/mark rate. There appears to be no reaction in May, the peak was reached in the end of July (a reaction to US rates news), and subsequently moved sideways/down. I suggest that at best the reaction "In the City" was mixed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 135.196.109.220 (talkcontribs). on 17 May 2006.

Nuestra Señora de la Concepción - Ambiguity?

[edit]

The article notes William Phips's role in finding the treasure of the sunken Nuestra Señora de la Concepción, which paid a great return to William Paterson. The article links to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuestra_Se%C3%B1ora_de_la_Concepci%C3%B3n, which is a 16th century ship sunk by Francis Drake. However, the Concepción that Phips recovered was apparently not built until 1620 and did not set sail until 1641, per this source: https://shiplib.org/index.php/shipwrecks/iberian-shipwrecks/spanish-and-the-new-world/nuestra-senora-de-la-concepcion-1641-2/ .

Is it possible there are two different Spanish ships using the same name? If not, could someone clarify how Drake pillaged the ship in 1580, yet there was still enough treasure in its wreck to be recovered in 1687? 199.94.1.20 (talk) 20:33, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]